<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Health Policy and Planning - current issue</title>
<link>http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Health Policy and Planning - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1460-2237</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>July 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Health Policy and Planning</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0268-1080</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/253?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/270?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/289?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/301?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/312?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The effects of global health initiatives on country health systems: a review of the evidence from HIV/AIDS control]]></title>
<link>http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper reviews country-level evidence about the impact of global health initiatives (GHIs), which have had profound effects on recipient country health systems in middle and low income countries. We have selected three initiatives that account for an estimated two-thirds of external funding earmarked for HIV/AIDS control in resource-poor countries: the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria, the World Bank Multi-country AIDS Program (MAP) and the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). This paper draws on 31 original country-specific and cross-country articles and reports, based on country-level fieldwork conducted between 2002 and 2007. Positive effects have included a rapid scale-up in HIV/AIDS service delivery, greater stakeholder participation, and channelling of funds to non-governmental stakeholders, mainly NGOs and faith-based bodies. Negative effects include distortion of recipient countries&rsquo; national policies, notably through distracting governments from coordinated efforts to strengthen health systems and re-verticalization of planning, management and monitoring and evaluation systems. Sub-national and district studies are needed to assess the degree to which GHIs are learning to align with and build the capacities of countries to respond to HIV/AIDS; whether marginalized populations access and benefit from GHI-funded programmes; and about the cost-effectiveness and long-term sustainability of the HIV and AIDS programmes funded by the GHIs. Three multi-country sets of evaluations, which will be reporting in 2009, will answer some of these questions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biesma, R. G, Brugha, R., Harmer, A., Walsh, A., Spicer, N., Walt, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapol/czp025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The effects of global health initiatives on country health systems: a review of the evidence from HIV/AIDS control]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>252</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/253?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pandemic influenza preparedness in Latin America: analysis of national strategic plans]]></title>
<link>http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/253?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The threat of a human pandemic of influenza has prompted the development of national influenza pandemic preparedness plans over the last 4 years. Analyses have been carried out to assess preparedness in Europe, Asia and Africa. We assessed plans to evaluate the national strategic pandemic influenza preparedness in the countries of Latin America.</p>
<p>Published national pandemic influenza preparedness plans from Latin American countries were evaluated against criteria drawn from the World Health Organization checklist. Plans were eligible for inclusion if formally published before 16 November 2007.</p>
<p>Fifteen national plans were identified and retrieved from the 17 Latin American countries surveyed. Latin American countries demonstrated different degrees of preparedness, and that a high level of completeness of plans was correlated to a country's wealth to a certain extent. Plans were judged strong in addressing surveillance requirements, and provided appropriate communication strategies directed to the general public and health care personnel. However, gaps remained, including the organization of health care services&rsquo; response; planning and maintenance of essential services; and the provision of containment measures such as the stockpiling of necessary medical supplies including vaccines and antiviral medications. In addition, some inconsistencies and variations which may be important, such as in border control measures and the capacity to contain outbreaks, exist between country plans&mdash;issues that could result in confusion in the event of a pandemic. A number of plans remain developmental in nature and, as elsewhere, more emphasis should be placed on strengthening the operability of plans, and in testing them. Whilst taking account of resources constraints, plans should be further developed in a coherent manner with both regional and international imperatives.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mensua, A., Mounier-Jack, S., Coker, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapol/czp019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pandemic influenza preparedness in Latin America: analysis of national strategic plans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>260</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/261?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Achieving measles control: lessons from the 2002-06 measles control strategy for Uganda]]></title>
<link>http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/261?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background</b> The 2002&ndash;06 measles control strategy for Uganda was implemented to strengthen routine immunization, undertake large-scale catch-up and follow-up vaccination campaigns, and to initiate nationwide case-based, laboratory-backed measles surveillance. This study examines the impact of this strategy on the epidemiology of measles in Uganda, and the lessons learnt.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> Number of measles cases and routine measles vaccination coverage reported by each district were obtained from the National Health Management Information System reports of 1997 to 2007. The immunization coverage by district in a given year was calculated by dividing the number of children immunized by the projected population in the same age category. Annual measles incidence for each year was derived by dividing the number of cases in a year by the mid-year projected population. Commercial measles IgM enzyme-linked immunoassay kits were used to confirm measles cases.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> Routine measles immunization coverage increased from 64% in 1997 to 90% in 2004, then stabilized around 87%. The 2003 national measles catch-up and 2006 follow-up campaigns reached 100% of children targeted with a measles supplemental dose. Over 80% coverage was also achieved with other child survival interventions. Case-based measles surveillance was rolled out nationwide to provide continuous epidemiological monitoring of measles occurrence. Following a 93% decline in measles incidence and no measles deaths, epidemic resurgence of measles occurred 3 years after a measles campaign targeting a wide age group, but no indigenous measles virus (D<SUB>10</SUB>) was isolated. Recurrence was delayed in regions where children were offered an early second opportunity for measles vaccination.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion</b> The integrated routine and campaign approach to providing a second opportunity for measles vaccination is effective in interrupting indigenous measles transmission and can be used to deliver other child survival interventions. Measles control can be sustained and the inter-epidemic interval lengthened by offering an early second opportunity for measles vaccination through other health delivery strategies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mbabazi, W. B, Nanyunja, M., Makumbi, I., Braka, F., Baliraine, F. N, Kisakye, A., Bwogi, J., Mugyenyi, P., Kabwongera, E., Lewis, R. F]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapol/czp008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Achieving measles control: lessons from the 2002-06 measles control strategy for Uganda]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/270?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Did professional attendance at home births improve early neonatal survival in Indonesia?]]></title>
<link>http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/270?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background</b> Early neonatal mortality has been persistently high in developing countries. Indonesia, with its national policy of home-based, midwife-assisted birth, is an apt context for assessing the effect of home-based professional birth attendance on early neonatal survival.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> We pooled four Indonesian Demographic and Health Surveys and used multivariate logistic regression to analyse trends in first-day and early neonatal mortality. We measured the effect of the context of delivery, including place and type of provider, and tested for changes in trend when the &lsquo;Midwife in the Village&rsquo; programme was initiated.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> Reported first-day mortality did not decrease significantly between 1986 and 2002, whereas early neonatal mortality decreased by an average of 3.2% annually. The rate of the decline did not change over the time period, either in 1989 when the Midwife in the Village programme was initiated, or in any year following when uptake of professional care increased. In simple and multivariate analyses, there were no significant differences in first-day or early neonatal death rates comparing home-based births with or without a professional midwife. Early neonatal mortality was higher in public facilities, likely due to selection. Biological determinants (twin births, male sex, short birth interval, previous early neonatal loss) were important for both outcomes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b> Decreasing newborn death rates in Indonesia are encouraging, but it is not clear that these decreases are associated with greater uptake of professional delivery care at home or in health facilities. This may suggest a need for improved training in immediate newborn care, strengthened emergency referral, and continued support for family planning policies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hatt, L., Stanton, C., Ronsmans, C., Makowiecka, K., Adisasmita, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapol/czp012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Did professional attendance at home births improve early neonatal survival in Indonesia?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>278</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bypassing primary care facilities for childbirth: a population-based study in rural Tanzania]]></title>
<link>http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In an effort to reduce maternal mortality, developing countries have been investing in village-level primary care facilities to bring skilled delivery services closer to women. We explored the extent to which women in rural western Tanzania bypass their nearest primary care facilities to deliver at more distant health facilities, using a population-representative survey of households (<I>N</I> = 1204). Using a standardized instrument, we asked women who had a delivery within 5 years about the place of their most recent delivery. Information on all functioning health facilities in the area were obtained from the district health office. Women who delivered in a health facility that was not the nearest available facility were considered bypassers. Forty-four per cent (186/423) of women who delivered in a health facility bypassed their nearest facility. In adjusted analysis, women who bypassed were more likely than women who did not bypass to be 35 or older (OR 2.5, <I>P</I> &le; 0.01), to have one or no living children (OR 2.2, <I>P</I> = 0.03), to have stayed in a maternity waiting home prior to delivery (OR 4.3, <I>P</I> &le; 0.01), to choose a facility on the basis of quality or experience (OR 2.1, <I>P</I> &le; 0.01), to have a high level of trust in health workers at the delivery facility (OR 2.7, <I>P</I> &le; 0.01), and to perceive the nearest facility to be of low quality (OR 3.1, <I>P</I> &le; 0.01). Bypassing for facility delivery is frequent among women in rural Tanzania. In addition to obstetric risk factors, a major reason for this appears to be a concern about the quality of care at government dispensaries and health centres. Investing in improved quality of care in primary care facilities may reduce bypassing and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the health system in providing coverage for facility delivery in rural Africa.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kruk, M. E, Mbaruku, G., McCord, C. W, Moran, M., Rockers, P. C, Galea, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapol/czp011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bypassing primary care facilities for childbirth: a population-based study in rural Tanzania]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>288</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/289?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Out-of-pocket costs for facility-based maternity care in three African countries]]></title>
<link>http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/289?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective</b> To estimate out-of-pocket medical expenses to women and families for maternity care at all levels of the health system in Burkina Faso, Kenya and Tanzania.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> In a population-based survey in 2003, 6345 women who had given birth in the previous 24 months were interviewed about the costs incurred during childbirth. Three years later, in 2006, an additional 8302 women with recent deliveries were interviewed in the same districts to explore their maternity care-seeking experiences and associated costs.</p>
<p><b>Findings</b> The majority of women interviewed reported paying out-of-pocket costs for facility-based deliveries. Out-of-pocket costs were highest in Kenya (a mean of US$18.4 for normal and complicated deliveries), where 98% of women who delivered in a health facility had to pay some fees. In Burkina Faso, 92% of women reported paying some fees (mean of US$7.9). Costs were lowest in Tanzania, where 91% of women reported paying some fees (mean of US$5.1). In all three countries, women in the poorest wealth quintile did not pay significantly less for maternity costs than the wealthiest women. Costs for complicated delivery were double those for normal delivery in Burkina Faso and Kenya, and represented more than 16% of mean monthly household income in Burkina Faso, and 35% in Kenya. In Tanzania and Burkina Faso most institutional births were at mid-level government health facilities (health centres or dispensaries). In contrast, in Kenya, 42% of births were at government hospitals, and 28% were at private or mission facilities, contributing to the overall higher costs in this country compared with Burkina Faso and Tanzania. However, among women delivering in government health facilities in Kenya, reported out-of-pocket costs were significantly lower in 2006 than in 2003, indicating that a 2004 national policy eliminating user fees at mid- and lower-level government health facilities was having some impact.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perkins, M., Brazier, E., Themmen, E., Bassane, B., Diallo, D., Mutunga, A., Mwakajonga, T., Ngobola, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapol/czp013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Out-of-pocket costs for facility-based maternity care in three African countries]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>300</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/301?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An experiment with community health funds in Afghanistan]]></title>
<link>http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/301?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>As Afghanistan rebuilds its health system, it faces key challenges in financing health services. To reduce dependence on donor funds, it is important to develop sustainable local financing mechanisms. A second challenge is to reduce high levels of out-of-pocket payments. Community-based health insurance (CBHI) schemes offer the possibility of raising revenues from communities and at the same time providing financial protection. This paper describes the performance of one type of CBHI scheme, the Community Health Fund (CHF), which was piloted for the first time in five provinces of Afghanistan between June 2005 and October 2006.</p>
<p>The performance of the CHF programme demonstrates that complex community-based health financing schemes can be implemented in post-conflict settings like Afghanistan, except in areas of high insecurity. The funds raised from the community, via premiums and user fees, enabled the pilot facilities to overcome temporary shortages of drugs and supplies, and to conduct outreach services via mobile clinics. However, enrolment and cost-recovery were modest. The median enrolment rate for premium-paying households was 6% of eligible households in the catchment areas of the clinics. Cost recovery rates ranged up to 16% of total operating costs and 32% of non-salary operating costs. No evidence of reduced out-of-pocket health expenditures was observed at the community level, though CHF members had markedly higher utilization of health services. The main reasons among non-members for not enrolling were being unaware of the programme; high premiums; and perceived low quality of services at the CHF clinics.</p>
<p>The performance of Afghanistan's CHF was similar to other CHF-type programmes operating at the primary care level internationally. The solution to building local capacity to finance health services lies in a combination of financing sources rather than any single mechanism. In this context, it is critical that international assistance for Afghanistan's health sector continues.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rao, K. D, Waters, H., Steinhardt, L., Alam, S., Hansen, P., Naeem, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapol/czp018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An experiment with community health funds in Afghanistan]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>301</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/312?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health services utilization during terminal illness in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia]]></title>
<link>http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/4/312?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives</b> We describe modern and alternative health services use in terminal illness of adults, and assess whether utilization patterns of TB/AIDS patients are distinct from those of patients suffering from other illnesses.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b> Data are from post-mortem interviews with close relatives or caretakers of the deceased. We provide descriptive statistics of health care utilization in adults and discuss their covariates in multivariate analyses.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> Over 85% of terminally sick patients visited a modern medical facility, but less than 40% spent more than 24 hours in a medical facility and only 25% died in one. Traditional healer (11%) and holy water (46%) visits offer a common treatment and healing alternative, but these visits do not co-vary in any consistent manner with the utilization of modern medical services. In terms of the cause of death, we find a higher contact rate with both modern and alternative medical service providers among TB/AIDS patients compared with those suffering from other medical conditions. The duration of illness seems to account for a good share of that variability. Other covariates of health services utilization are socio-economic status, education and age.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b> The contact rate of adults with modern medical facilities in terminal illness is almost universal, but their usage intensity is rather low. Alternative curative options are less commonly used, and do not exclude modern health services use. This suggests that both types of services are considered complements rather than alternatives for each other. Because the contact rate with health service providers is greatest for TB/AIDS patients, it is unlikely that HIV/AIDS-related stigma is an impediment to seeking care. We cannot exclude, however, that it delays health-seeking behaviour.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reniers, G., Tesfai, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/heapol/czp015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health services utilization during terminal illness in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>