Skip Navigation

Health Policy and Planning 2007 22(1):28-39; doi:10.1093/heapol/czl031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atun, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Gurol-Urganci, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atun, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Gurol-Urganci, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2006; all rights reserved.

Diffusion of complex health innovations—implementation of primary health care reforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Rifat A Atun1,*, Ioannis Kyratsis1, Gordan Jelic2, Drazenka Rados-Malicbegovic3 and Ipek Gurol-Urganci1

1Centre for Health Management, Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.
2Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Banja Luka, Republika Srpska.
3Ministry of Health, Sarajevo, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

* Corresponding author. Director, Centre for Health Management Tanaka Business School, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. E-mail: r.atun{at}imperial.ac.uk

Most transition countries in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia are engaged in health reform initiatives aimed at introducing primary health care (PHC) centred on family medicine to enhance performance of their health systems. But, in these countries the introduction of PHC reforms has been particularly challenging; while some have managed to introduce pilots, many have failed to these scale up.

Using an innovation lens, we examine the introduction and diffusion of family-medicine-centred PHC reforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), which experienced bitter ethnic conflicts that destroyed much of the health systems infrastructure. The study was conducted in 2004–05 over a 18-month period and involved both qualitative and quantitative methods of inquiry. In this study we report the findings of the qualitative research, which involved in-depth interviews in three stages with key informants that were purposively sampled. In our research, we applied a proprietary analytical framework which enables simultaneous and holistic analysis of the context, the innovation, the adopters and the interactions between them over time.

While many transition countries have struggled with the introduction of family-medicine-centred PHC reforms, in spite of considerable resource constraints and a challenging post-war context, within a few years, BiH has managed to scale up multifaceted reforms to cover over 25% of the country. Our analysis reveals a complex setting and bidirectional interaction between the innovation, adopters and the context, which have collectively influenced the diffusion process. Family-medicine-centred PHC reform is a complex innovation—involving organizational, financial, clinical and relational changes—within a complex adaptive system. An important factor influencing the adoption of this complex innovation in BiH was the perceived benefits of the innovation: benefits which accrue to the users, family physicians, nurses and policy makers. In the case of BiH, policies or the innovation are not simply disseminated, but rather assimilated into the health system. The assimilation and implementation of the new PHC model relied on the consensus of a diverse group of adopters; the changes brought by the reforms were aligned with the expectations of the adopters: this created a ‘receptive context’ for adoption and diffusion of the innovation. The new family-medicine-centred PHC service model had a major impact on professional identity, inter-professional relationships and organizational routines. The post-conflict context was perceived as an opportunity to introduce the new model and implement transformational change, while the complex government structure meant the process of diffusion was as important as the innovation itself. In BiH, a holistic approach—comprising multifaceted and simultaneous interventions at multiple levels of the health system—reduced ‘policy resistance’ and enhanced the adoption and diffusion of the PHC reforms.

Key Words: Innovation, primary health care, family medicine, health systems, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Accepted for publication 31 May 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
R. Atun, T. de Jongh, F. Secci, K. Ohiri, and O. Adeyi
Integration of targeted health interventions into health systems: a conceptual framework for analysis
Health Policy Plan., November 16, 2009; (2009) czp055v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.