Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castano, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Morales, L. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castano, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Morales, L. G
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 17(90001): 5-11
© Oxford University Press 2002

Equitable financing, out-of-pocket payments and the role of health care reform in Colombia

Ramon A Castano1, Jose J Arbelaez2, Ursula B Giedion3 and Luis G Morales3

1 >FEDESARROLLO, Colombia,
2 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA*,
3 Bitran Asociados, Santiago, Chile* and
4 Abt Associates, Bethesda, MD, USA*
* Not representing these institutions at the time the research project was undertaken.

For a health care system to be considered equitable in its financing, the financial burden of contributions has to be progressive or at least proportional. Out-of-pocket financing takes a larger proportion of poor than of non-poor households’ income. To remedy this regressive burden, among other goals, Colombia launched a health care reform based on social insurance as a means to reduce health care financing through out-of-pocket payments, and to reduce financial barriers to access. This paper analyzes the evolution of regressivity in out-of-pocket financing from 1984 to 1997, in order to detect if the 1993 health care reform had an impact on such regressivity.

The Kakwani index of progressivity was estimated using three national household surveys. Kakwani indices showed a constant trend towards more regressivity (–0.126 in 1984, to –0.3498 in 1997) when using income to build the index, but a trend towards progressivity (–0.0092 in 1984, to 0.0026 in 1997) when using expenses.

Our findings suggest that there was a progressive impact of the reform on out-of-pocket financing when household expenses are used to build the Kakwani index; however, due to issues of comparability between surveys, the findings are not conclusive.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Policy PlanHome page
S. R Adhikari, N. M Maskay, and B. P Sharma
Paying for hospital-based care of Kala-azar in Nepal: assessing catastrophic, impoverishment and economic consequences
Health Policy Plan., March 1, 2009; 24(2): 129 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
F. G De Maio
Income inequality measures
J Epidemiol Community Health, October 1, 2007; 61(10): 849 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.