Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bossert, T. J
Right arrow Articles by Beauvais, J. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bossert, T. J
Right arrow Articles by Beauvais, J. C
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 17(1): 14-31
© Oxford University Press 2002

Decentralization of health systems in Ghana, Zambia, Uganda and the Philippines: a comparative analysis of decision space

Thomas J Bossert1 and Joel C Beauvais2

1 Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA and
2 New York University School of Law, New York, NY, USA

This study reviews the experience of decentralization in four developing countries: Ghana, Uganda, Zambia and the Philippines. It uses two analytical frameworks to describe and compare the types and degrees of decentralization in each country. The first framework specifies three types of decentralization: deconcentration, delegation and devolution. The second framework uses a principal agent approach and innovative maps of ‘decision space’ to define the range of choice for different functions that is transferred from the centre to the periphery of the system. The analysis finds a variety of different types and degrees of decentralization, with the Philippines demonstrating the widest range of choice over many functions that were devolved to local government units. The least choice was transferred through delegation to an autonomous health service in Ghana. Uganda and Zambia display variations between these extremes. There was insufficient evidence of the impact of decentralization to assess how these differences in ‘decision space’ influenced the performance of each health system. The authors suggest that this is a major area for future research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Policy PlanHome page
R. Atun, T. de Jongh, F. Secci, K. Ohiri, and O. Adeyi
Integration of targeted health interventions into health systems: a conceptual framework for analysis
Health Policy Plan., November 16, 2009; (2009) czp055v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and UrbanizationHome page
T. Kjellstrom and S. Mercado
Towards action on social determinants for health equity in urban settings
Environment and Urbanization, October 1, 2008; 20(2): 551 - 574.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Policy PlanHome page
T. J Bossert, D. M Bowser, and J. K Amenyah
Is decentralization good for logistics systems? Evidence on essential medicine logistics in Ghana and Guatemala
Health Policy Plan., March 1, 2007; 22(2): 73 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AJPHHome page
P. Fajans, R. Simmons, and L. Ghiron
Helping Public Sector Health Systems Innovate: The Strategic Approach to Strengthening Reproductive Health Policies and Programs
Am J Public Health, March 1, 2006; 96(3): 435 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.