Skip Navigation



Health Policy and Planning Advance Access published online on September 2, 2009

Health Policy and Planning, doi:10.1093/heapol/czp039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/1/61    most recent
czp039v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rades, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rades, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2009; all rights reserved.

"This body does not want free medicines": South African consumer perceptions of drug quality

Aarti Patel1,*, Robin Gauld2, Pauline Norris1 and Thomas Rades1

1 School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, New Zealand.
2 Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand.

* Corresponding author. School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. Tel: +64–3–479 7133. Fax: +64–3–479 7034. E-mail: aarti.patel{at}otago.ac.nz

Objectives Like many other developing countries, South Africa provides free medicines through its public health care facilities. Recent policies encourage generic substitution in the private sector. This study explored South African consumer perceptions of drug quality and whether these perceptions influenced how people procured and used their medicines.

Methods The study was undertaken in Durban, Cape Town and Johannesburg in South Africa between December 2005 and January 2006. A combination of purposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit participants from low and middle socio-economic groups as well as the elderly and teenagers. Data were collected through 12 focus group discussions involving a total of 73 participants. Interviews were tape-recorded. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcripts.

Results Irrespective of socio-economic status, respondents described medicine quality in terms of the effect the medicine produced on felt symptoms. Generic medicines, as well as medicines supplied without charge by the state, were considered to be poor quality and treated with suspicion. Respondents obtained medicines from three sources: public sector hospitals and/or clinics, dispensing doctors and community pharmacies. Cost, avoidance of feeling ‘second-class’, receiving individualized care and choice in drug selection were the main determinants influencing their procurement behaviour. Selection of over-the-counter medicines was influenced by prior knowledge of products, through advertising and previous use. Participants perceived that they had limited influence on selection of prescription medicines. Generic substitution would be supported if the doctor, rather than the pharmacist, recommended it.

Conclusions Our findings emphasize the importance of meaningful consumer involvement in the development of national medicines policies, and strategic campaigns targeting consumers and prescribers regarding the quality of generic and essential medicines. Where consumers perceive free or generic medicines as inferior, this could significantly undermine attempts to implement national medicines policies aimed to improve access to medicines.

Key Words: Drug quality, developing countries, national medicines policies, generic medicines, consumer perceptions.

Accepted for publication 16 July 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.