Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AKPALA, C. O
Right arrow Articles by NWAGBO, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by AKPALA, C. O
Right arrow Articles by NWAGBO, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 8(1): 78-81
© 1993

other

Mobilization for mass distribution of ivermectin in eastern Nigeria

CYRIL O AKPALA, PAUL O OKONKWO and DOUGLAS NWAGBO

University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu, Nigeria

Correspondence: Dr Cyril O Akpala, Department of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, PMB 01129, Enugu, Nigeria.

Onchocerciasis constitutes a major public health problem in Nigeria, with approximately 40 million people at risk of infection. In 1988, a Tropical Diseases Research-funded project began, that was aimed at drastically reducing the high prevalence of the disease in Achi, south eastern Nigeria, through the active participation of the eligible population. This was done through the mass distribution of ivermectin. The community was mobilized through meetings with various leaders in Achi, and through the provision of health information and education to the entire community.

The active participation of the community in the mass distribution of ivermectin involved both the utilization of the services provided and the contribution of resources towards the project's implementation. More than 70% of the eligible population took the drug. Resource inputs by the community included free labour and time donated by volunteers, and the donation of food and infrastructure, although there were no direct financial contributions. The community also nominated some of their number to train as field workers to assist in field surveys and to provide health information and education to the community. Factors contributing to the success of community participation in the project, which may be of relevance to similar projects elsewhere, are also discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.