Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSSON, N.
Right arrow Articles by LEDOGAR, R. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSSON, N.
Right arrow Articles by LEDOGAR, R. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 7(4): 352-363
© 1992


review-article

Who pays for measles? The economic arguments for sustained immunization

NEIL ANDERSSON1,, SERGIO PAREDES1, JOSE LEGORRETA1 and ROBERT J LEDOGAR1

1Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero Acapulco, Mexico

Correspondence: Professor Neil Andersson, Senior Research Adviser, UNICEF, 3 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA

Increasing international commitment to Universal Child Immunization (UCI) intensifies pressures on already scarce health resources. The costs of the 1989/90 measles epidemic were measured in the State of Guerrero, Mexico, from the perspective of the health services and 43 representative communities. Financial loss was incurred from illness in families of 70% of the 1211 measles cases in a study population of 50294. Some 30% of these families did not have sufficient cash reserves and sold labour, farm animals or other assets. Among those families, 20% took loans in order to pay the health care costs of their children's measles, 19% sold grain stores and 4% indentured their future labour.

Standardizing household expenditure on local labour costs, it was possible to quantify out-of-pocket expenditure and loss of work time. The average cost of a measles case to the community amounted to the local equivalent of 18.8 work days of an unskilled labourer, with 27 work days per household affected, excluding income foregone due to early deaths. Hastings and colleagues calculated the average cost of measles to British families in 1985 to be UK£11.09, considerably less than a day's wage for a British unskilled labourer at that time. Applying the costs in the 43 communities to the whole State of Guerrero, without placing a cash value on some 4000 children aged under five who died from measles, the epidemic cost the community the equivalent of 1.6 million work days. The health services spent 10% of this value on the epidemic. The cost of vaccinating all children in the State could be sustained for five years, and increase by 10% per year, and it would still be lower than the economic cost of an epidemic to the communities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
, S , C. , and
Future of research into rotavirus
BMJ, January 13, 2001; 322(7278): 106 - 106.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
N. Andersson, C. P. da Sousa, and S. Paredes
Social cost of land mines in four countries: Afghanistan, Bosnia, Cambodia, and Mozambique
BMJ, September 16, 1995; 311(7007): 718 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.