Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WIBULPOLPRASERT, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WIBULPOLPRASERT, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 6(4): 354-360
© 1991


research-article

Community financing: Thailand's experience

SUWIT WIBULPOLPRASERT

Northeastern Regional College of Public Health Khon Kaen, Thailand

Dr Suwit Wibulpolprasert, Director, Northeastern Regional Public Health College, 90/1 Anamai Road, Amphur Moeng, Khon Kaen 40000, Thailand

This paper attempts to explain the basic concept behind the development of various community financing schemes for health in Thailand. It gives a brief review of four major schemes, as well as the factors contributing to their success and failure. In Thailand, various community financing schemes were developed through the process of primary health care. These are considered as part of the total community development rather than a mere source of financial support for health services. While the coverage of community funds amounted to almost 50% of the rural villages, the total amount of the funds was less than 1% of the total health expenditure of the country.

Village drug funds were the first scheme to be developed in 1980. These were very successful, with a continuation rate (until 1988) of up to 80.94%. The coverage of rural villages was almost 50%, and the total fund amounted to 60 million bahts. The nutrition fund was the least successful scheme, due to its particular activities, low acceptance among the people, and limited capital appreciation. It now no longer exists. Sanitation and health card funds are fairly successful. They have higher capital appreciation and diverse sources of income. They contribute to the higher provision of environmental sanitation and basic medical services.

Many single purpose funds were diversified into multipurpose health development funds or into multipurpose village development funds. Four major factors which have contributed to the success/failure of community financing schemes: government policy, support from health personnel, community infrastructure, and type of funds, are explored.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.