Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 4(1): 40-49
© 1989


review-article

Evaluating water and sanitation projects: lessons from I mo State, Nigeria

THE IMO STATE EVALUATION TEAM|#1

The Imo State Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Project was a pilot intervention launched in late 1982. In the three intervention villages, the project installed boreholes with handpumps, promoted ventilated improved pit latrines, provided health and hygiene education through village-based workers and encouraged a high level of community involvement. An evaluation of the health impact was an integral part of the project's implementation and was based on a quasi-experimental design with two control villages. The evaluation used both longitudinal and cross-sectional surveys to collect information over the 3V4 year period covering the pro-, peri-, and post-intervention periods. Diarrhoea and dracunculiasis (guinea worm disease) were the main health indicators studied. In addition a wide range of intervening variables was also examined.

The project experienced a number of difficulties with implementation, particularly with regard to the sanitation and educational components, because of the experimental approach and emphasis on community involvement. Due to the widespread use of water from boreholes, the project showed an impact on dracunculiasis. The impact on diarrhoea was not clearly shown although some water-associated behaviour was associated with a lower risk of diarrhoea in the intervention villages. The prevalence of wasting (under 80% weight-for-height) among children under three years of age decreased significantly over time in the intervention but not in the control villages.

The lessons learned from the health impact evaluation have important implications for future studies. A number of recommendations are made which relate to the planning and implementation of water and sanitation projects and to their monitoring and evaluation.

1Correspondence: Betty Kirkwood, Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.