Skip Navigation


Health Policy and Planning Advance Access originally published online on February 13, 2007
Health Policy and Planning 2007 22(2):83-94; doi:10.1093/heapol/czm003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/2/83    most recent
czm003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by David, P H
Right arrow Articles by Potemkina, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by David, P H
Right arrow Articles by Potemkina, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2007; all rights reserved.

Women's reproductive health needs in Russia: what can we learn from an intervention to improve post-abortion care?

P H David1,*, L Reichenbach2, I Savelieva3, N Vartapetova4 and R Potemkina5

1International Services, American Red Cross National Headquarters, 2025 E Street NW, Washington DC 20006, USA.
2Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA, USA.
3Research Centre of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Moscow, Russia.
4John Snow, Inc., Moscow, Russia.
5State Research Centre for Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia.

* Corresponding author. International Services, American Red Cross National Headquarters, 2025 E Street NW, Washington DC 20006, USA. Tel: +1 202 303 5259; Fax: +1 202 303 0053. E-mail: davidpa{at}usa.redcross.org

It has been well documented that abortion is a common means of controlling fertility in Russia. Women undergo repeat abortions throughout their reproductive lives, but recent studies of abortion trends in the Russian Federation suggest that abortion rates are on the decline, use of modern contraceptives is increasing, and women dislike abortion as a method of fertility control. Using data collected during 1999–2003 in women's health facilities in three Russian cities, this paper reports the results of an evaluation of interventions to improve post-abortion care, which show an impressive increase in post-abortion contraceptive counselling but no reduction in the rate at which women present at clinics for repeat abortions. The findings indicate a discrepancy between women's stated preferences for modern medical contraceptive methods and their abortion-seeking behaviour. Further exploration of these data suggests that certain women resort to abortion with greater frequency than others, and points to the need for a more focused investigation of these women. These results indicate the complexities associated with changing what has been a relatively common and long-standing practice, and have implications for improving reproductive health services. Meeting the reproductive health needs of Russian women requires not only improved provider and client knowledge but may also demand a more focused delivery of client-centred care than may be the case in other settings.

Key Words: Reproductive health policy, abortion, post-abortion care, Russia, contraceptive counselling, family planning programmes


This study was completed while the corresponding author was Senior Evaluation Advisor with John Snow, Inc., 44 Farnsworth Street, Boston, MA, USA.

Accepted for publication 1 December 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.