Skip Navigation


Health Policy and Planning Advance Access originally published online on March 7, 2006
Health Policy and Planning 2006 21(3):157-170; doi:10.1093/heapol/czl003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/157    most recent
czl003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knapp, M.
Right arrow Articles by McDaid, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knapp, M.
Right arrow Articles by McDaid, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. All rights reserved.

Economic barriers to better mental health practice and policy

Martin Knapp1,2, Michelle Funk3, Claire Curran1, Martin Prince4, Margaret Grigg5 and David McDaid1,6

1Personal Social Services Research Unit, LSE Health and Social Care, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK, 2Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK, 3Mental Health Policy and Service Development, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 4International Mental Health, Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK, 5Mental Health Department of Human Services, Victoria, Australia (formerly Mental Health Policy and Service Development, World Health Organization, Geneva) and 6European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK

Correspondence: Martin Knapp, LSE Health & Social Care, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. Tel: +44 (0)20–7955–6225. E-mail: M.Knapp{at}lse.ac.uk.

Mental health systems in many countries are seriously under-developed, yet mental health problems not only have huge consequences for quality of life, but – particularly in low- and middle-income countries – contribute to continued economic burden and reinforce poverty. This paper discusses economic barriers to improving the availability, accessibility, efficiency and equity of mental health care in low- and middle-income countries. Six sets of barriers are identified: an information barrier, resource insufficiency, resource distribution, resource inappropriateness, resource inflexibility and resource timing. Overcoming these barriers will be a major task, although there is no shortage of suggestions for action. The paper discusses broadening the evidence base, improving mental health literacy, tackling stigma, improving financing mechanisms, prioritizing and protecting mental health care budgets, emphasizing mental health promotion through the development of resilience, exploring routes to improved equity, experimenting with new arrangements for purchasing and delivering services, improving coordination between agencies and professionals at both macro- and micro-levels, building alliances between public and private sectors, and training and mobilizing primary care services to improve identification and treatment of mental health problems.

Key Words: mental health, low-income countries, barriers to effectiveness, economics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.