Health Policy and Planning; 18(2): 214-224
© Oxford University Press
2003
Implementing a new health management information system in Uganda
1 Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,
2 Sheffield Health and Social Research Consortium and
3 Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield, UK
This paper reports on research investigating the health management information system (HMIS) implementation process in Uganda, utilizing the diffusion of innovation and dynamic equilibrium organizational change models. Neither perspective guided the HMIS development process. Instead, technological issues, rather than wider organizational issues, dominated the planned change. The need to consider the organizational context when changing information systems arises because the process is more complex than some practitioners have realized, when attempting to understand the causes of information management problems and developing HMIS in low-income countries.
In particular, information system developers had not acknowledged that they were promoting an informational approach to management when they promoted a change from a centralized reporting system to a HMIS supporting use of information at the level of collection. Strategies to facilitate this approach were not advocated.
Organizational theory can contribute to the diffusion of innovation framework. It has yielded an integration of Rogerss diffusion of innovation framework and Leavitts concept of organizational forces in equilibrium. The diffusion framework describes the process, but the organizational model has given the context and reason for aspects of the process. The diffusion model does not predict what needs to change within the organization when a particular innovation is introduced, or how much. The addition of the organizational model has helped.
These frameworks can facilitate the introduction of future information management innovations and allow practitioners to perceive their introduction as a staged process needing to be managed. Implications for practice are identified.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Gilson and N. Raphaely The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature 1994-2007 Health Policy Plan., September 1, 2008; 23(5): 294 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. England and D. Stewart Executive management and IT innovation in health: identifying the barriers to adoption Health Informatics Journal, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 75 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. I Mutemwa HMIS and decision-making in Zambia: re-thinking information solutions for district health management in decentralized health systems Health Policy Plan., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 40 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N Chaulagai, C. M Moyo, J. Koot, H. B. Moyo, T. C Sambakunsi, F. M Khunga, and P. D Naphini Design and implementation of a health management information system in Malawi: issues, innovations and results Health Policy Plan., November 1, 2005; 20(6): 375 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gladwin and A. Clarke Information Management Strategies and Death Certification in the UK Health Informatics Journal, December 1, 2003; 9(4): 283 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

