Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bishai, D.
Right arrow Articles by Koenig, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bishai, D.
Right arrow Articles by Koenig, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 17(4): 412-419
© Oxford University Press 2002

The role of public health programmes in reducing socioeconomic inequities in childhood immunization coverage

David Bishai1, Emi Suzuki1, Michael McQuestion1, Jyostnamoy Chakraborty2 and Michael Koenig1

1 Department of Population and Family Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA and
2 International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B), Dhaka, Bangladesh

Objectives: This paper asks whether intensive outreach services can eliminate socioeconomic differentials in vaccine coverage.

Methods: In 1990, the Matlab Maternal and Child Health/Family Planning Project (MCH-FP) surveyed 4238 respondents in an intervention area that received outreach and 3708 respondents in a comparison area in rural Bangladesh. Interacted multiple regression methods assessed the degree to which various socioeconomic indicators predicted the probability of vaccine receipt in each area.

Results: Low parental schooling, small dwelling size and female gender were significantly associated with incomplete vaccination in the comparison area, where only the limited government services existed. Residence in the MCH-FP outreach area greatly reduced, and in some cases eliminated, the effects of these socioeconomic barriers to vaccine receipt.

Conclusions: Public health programmes utilizing outreach can reduce prevailing gender and socioeconomic differentials in vaccine receipt.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Asia Pac J Public HealthHome page
Md. J. Uddin, C. P. Larson, E. Oliveras, A. I. Khan, M. A. Md. A. Quaiyum, and N. Chandra Saha
Child Immunization Coverage in Rural Hard-to-Reach Haor Areas of Bangladesh: Possible Alternative Strategies
Asia Pac J Public Health, January 1, 2009; 21(1): 8 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Policy PlanHome page
A. H Baqui, A. M Rosecrans, E. K Williams, P. K Agrawal, S. Ahmed, G. L Darmstadt, V. Kumar, U. Kiran, D. Panwar, R. C Ahuja, et al.
NGO facilitation of a government community-based maternal and neonatal health programme in rural India: improvements in equity
Health Policy Plan., July 1, 2008; 23(4): 234 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Policy PlanHome page
J. Holmes
Do community factors have a differential impact on the health outcomes of boys and girls? Evidence from rural Pakistan
Health Policy Plan., May 1, 2006; 21(3): 231 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.