Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowden, A
Right arrow Articles by Wanjau, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowden, A
Right arrow Articles by Wanjau, J
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 17(3): 322-330
© Oxford University Press 2002

How to do (or not to do)...

Methods for pre-testing and piloting survey questions: illustrations from the KENQOL survey of health-related quality of life

A Bowden1, JA Fox-Rushby1, L Nyandieka2 and J Wanjau2

1 Health Policy Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK, and
2 Centre for Public Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya

Part of the assertion that any survey researcher can make about the validity of their results needs to contain an analysis of questions and their responses from the respondent’s viewpoint. Claims concerning the validity, reliability and sensitivity of health-related quality of life measures tend to be based on the quantitative approach of psychometrics, which fails to identify when respondents: misinterpret questions; do not recall the information requested; or give answers that present themselves in a better or worse light. The paper presents some approaches to pre-testing and piloting survey questionnaires to check the interpretation of survey questions, using illustrations from the KENQOL project. The paper describes: how the intended referential and connotative meaning of each question was established; the criteria to judge the appropriateness of each question; the methods used to make those judgements; and the process of reviewing questions based on findings. The role of piloting is highlighted, and further reading is suggested for readers wishing to develop a model for their own investigation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
B Roberts, K F. Ocaka, J Browne, T Oyok, and E Sondorp
Factors associated with the health status of internally displaced persons in northern Uganda
J Epidemiol Community Health, March 1, 2009; 63(3): 227 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
K. E.A. Burns MD MSc, M. Duffett BScPharm, M. E. Kho PT MSc, M. O. Meade MD MSc, N. K.J. Adhikari MDCM MSc, T. Sinuff MD PhD, D. J. Cook MD MSc, and for the ACCADEMY Group
A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians
Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 29, 2008; 179(3): 245 - 252.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
M. J De Silva, T. Harpham, S. R Huttly, R. Bartolini, and M. E Penny
Understanding sources and types of social capital in Peru
Community Dev. J., January 1, 2007; 42(1): 19 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.