Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ensor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Moral, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ensor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Moral, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 17(3): 247-256
© Oxford University Press 2002

Do essential service packages benefit the poor? Preliminary evidence from Bangladesh

Tim Ensor, Priti Dave-Sen, Liaquat Ali, Atia Hossain, Shamim Ara Begum and Hamid Moral

Health Economics Unit, Policy and Research Unit, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dhaka, Bangladesh

In 1998 Bangladesh began a sector wide approach (SWAp) to the extension of health care to vulnerable groups in the country. The central feature of this approach is the funding of an essential service package (ESP) emphasizing maternal care, certain communicable diseases and child health.

This study examines the way in which public sector expenditures are distributed by comparing the actual beneficiaries of spending with the target groups identified by the sector strategy. It finds that while the ESP is helping to target resources at priority services, considerable barriers to access by vulnerable groups persist.

The study suggests a number of issues that need to be addressed to improve the performance of the programme. First, improved targeting requires greater emphasis on the process of access to key services. Secondly, improving the efficiency of service provision at primary level is a key element to increasing access, since individual primary providers are often not ready to provide the standard of care required by the ESP approach to services. Finally, the system of financial control and management needs to be modified in order to make allocations more responsive to the priorities determined by the SWAp.

Given the widespread adoption of the ESP approach to health care, the paper also suggests a wider research agenda that examines its impact in other countries and evaluates this worldwide experiment in health service prioritization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 South Asian SurveyHome page
F. A. Osman
Health Policy, Programmes and System in Bangladesh: Achievements and Challenges
South Asian Survey, September 1, 2008; 15(2): 263 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Health ManagementHome page
M. K. Ahsan and J. Bartlema
Introduction of User Fees: A Viable Means of Health Care Financing?
Journal of Health Management, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 87 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AJPHHome page
M. E. Kruk, M. R. Prescott, and S. Galea
Equity of Skilled Birth Attendant Utilization in Developing Countries: Financing and Policy Determinants
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2008; 98(1): 142 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.