Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baltussen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sauerborn, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baltussen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sauerborn, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 17(1): 42-48
© Oxford University Press 2002

Perceived quality of care of primary health care services in Burkina Faso

RMPM Baltussen1,2, Y YÉ2, S Haddad3 and RS Sauerborn1

1 Department of Tropical Hygiene and Public Health, Heidelberg, Germany,
2 Centre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Burkina Faso and
3 Groupe de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Santé, Université de Montréal, Canada

Introduction: Patients’ views are being given more and more importance in policy-making. Understanding populations’ perceptions of quality of care is critical to developing measures to increase the utilization of primary health care services.

Objective: Documentation of user’s opinion on the quality of care of primary health care services.

Methods: A 20-item scale, including four sub-scales related to health personnel practices and conduct, adequacy of resources and services, health care delivery, and financial and physical accessibility, was administered to 1081 users of 11 health care centres in the health district of Nouna, in rural Burkina Faso.

Results: The respondents were relatively positive on items related to health personnel practices and conduct and to health care delivery, but less so on items related to adequacy of resources and services and to financial and physical accessibility. In particular, the availability of drugs for all diseases on the spot, the adequacy of rooms and equipment in the facilities, the costs of care and the access to credit were valued poorly. Overall, the urban hospital was rated poorer than the average rural health care centre. Analysis of variance showed that, overall, health system characteristics explain 29% of all variation of the responses.

Conclusion: Improving drug availability and financial accessibility to health services have been identified as the two main priorities for health policy action. Policy-makers should respect these patient preferences to deliver effective improvement of the quality of care as a potential means to increase utilization of health care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
K. D. Rao, D. H. Peters, and K. Bandeen-Roche
Towards patient-centered health services in India--a scale to measure patient perceptions of quality
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2006; 18(6): 414 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
R. Baltussen and Y. Ye
Quality of care of modern health services as perceived by users and non-users in Burkina Faso
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 1, 2006; 18(1): 30 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
D. van Duong, C. W. Binns, A. H. Lee, and D. B. Hipgrave
Measuring client-perceived quality of maternity services in rural Vietnam
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 16(6): 447 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.