Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kumaranayake, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kumaranayake, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 17(1): 112-118
© Oxford University Press 2002

How to do (or not to do)...

Allowing for differential timing in cost analyses: discounting and annualization

Damian Walker and Lilani Kumaranayake

Health Policy Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

There are differences in timing related to when costs of certain inputs are incurred and when they are used over the lifetime of a programme. This paper looks at the issues related to the comparison of cost data over time focusing on discounting and annualization adjustments, which are used by economists to calculate financial and economic costs. The process of discounting is used to deal with the notion of time preference. Time preference implies that future costs are worth less, and hence discounted more, to reflect individual and societal preferences to have resources and money now rather than in the future. While discounting is appropriate in many situations, it is also useful to compute an annual equivalent cost when recurrent costs of an intervention are incurred, or are expected to be incurred, in subsequent years. This approach has the added benefit of illustrating how capital items are actually used during the lifetime of an intervention. This paper presents methods to both discount and annualize costs, and discusses rules-of-thumb to decide when to make these adjustments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Policy PlanHome page
A Vassall, Y Chechulin, I Raykhert, N Osalenko, S Svetlichnaya, A Kovalyova, M. van der Werf, L. Turchenko, E Hasker, K Miskinis, et al.
Reforming tuberculosis control in Ukraine: results of pilot projects and implications for the national scale-up of DOTS
Health Policy Plan., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 55 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Trop Med HygHome page
V. WISEMAN, W. A. HAWLEY, F. O. TER KUILE, P. A. PHILLIPS-HOWARD, J. M. VULULE, B. L. NAHLEN, and J. MILLS
THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PERMETHRIN-TREATED BED NETS IN AN AREA OF INTENSE MALARIA TRANSMISSION IN WESTERN KENYA
Am J Trop Med Hyg, April 1, 2003; 68(90040): 161 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.