Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramiro, L. S
Right arrow Articles by Hawken, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramiro, L. S
Right arrow Articles by Hawken, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 16(90002): 61-69
© Oxford University Press 2001

Community participation in local health boards in a decentralized setting: cases from the Philippines

Laurie S Ramiro1, Fatima A Castillo1, Tessa Tan-Torres2, Cristina E Torres1, Josefina G Tayag1, Rolando G Talampas1 and Laura Hawken3

1 Department of Social Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences,
2 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines and
3 WHO Humanitarian Mission, Albania

Decentralization has been associated traditionally with participation and empowerment in local decision-making. This study of four cases analyzed the role of local health boards in enhancing community participation and empowerment under a decentralized system in the Philippines. Local government units (LGUs) with functioning local health boards were compared with LGUs whose health boards were not meeting regularly as mandated by law. The study found that there were more consultations with the community, fund-raising activities, health initiatives and higher per capita health expenditure in LGUs with functioning local health boards. Only the mayors and municipal health officers felt empowered by devolution. In general, awareness of devolution and their potential roles in health decision-making was low among members of the community. These findings can be attributed to the socio-cultural and historical traditions of centralized governance with little popular participation, overall attitudes of the community and board members, perceptions of health as primarily a medical matter, economic circumstances of LGUs, and insufficient preparation for devolution. Recommendations are suggested in response to these findings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
G. M. Mubyazi, A. Mushi, M. Kamugisha, J. Massaga, K. Y. Mdira, M. Segeja, and K. J. Njunwa
Community views on health sector reform and their participation in health priority setting: case of Lushoto and Muheza districts, Tanzania
J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2007; 29(2): 147 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.