Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aidoo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Harpham, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aidoo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Harpham, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 16(2): 206-213
© Oxford University Press 2001

The explanatory models of mental health amongst low-income women and health care practitioners in Lusaka, Zambia

Magna Aidoo1 and Trudy Harpham2

1 Director, UHP/AHEAD and
2 Professor of Urban Development and Policy, South Bank University, London, UK

There is currently much debate about the cultural construction and specificity of mental health. It is thus not surprising that explanatory models, which look at the meaning of illness for those suffering from it, have been widely used within the mental health field. This paper considers the significance of explanatory models and presents a study comparing the explanatory models of mental ill health used by urban women in low-income groups and local health care practitioners in Zambia. To measure mental ill-health status, an instrument recommended by the World Health Organization was used – the Self Reporting Questionnaire, 20 items (SRQ 20). To obtain explanatory models, Kleinman’s classic eight questions were adapted.

The terms used by the practitioners to define and explain the mental health problems of women in low-income groups were ‘stress and depression’, with these two concepts being used interchangeably. In contrast, the phrase most frequently used by the women was ‘problems of the mind’. The professionals regarded the experience of depression itself as a manifestation of ill health. For the women, however, only the physical symptoms were defined as ill health. There was a common agreement, however, that the women’s socioeconomic situation as a major causal factor. Both groups identified the home environment as a key determinant, particularly the quality of marital relationships.

Greater awareness of explanatory models may have beneficial effects on mental health policy and planning, both at national levels (where recognition of the true prevalence and burden of mental ill health should have an impact on public health policy) and at the level of local implementation (where training of health professionals to take patients’ explanatory models into account might contribute towards the diagnosis of mental health problems).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
WORLD BANK ECON REVHome page
J. Das, Q.-T. Do, J. Friedman, and D. McKenzie
Mental Health Patterns and Consequences: Results from Survey Data in Five Developing Countries
World Bank Econ. Rev., January 1, 2009; 23(1): 31 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Global Social PolicyHome page
V. Bhavsar and D. Bhugra
Globalization: Mental Health and Social Economic Factors
Global Social Policy, December 1, 2008; 8(3): 378 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Transcultural PsychiatryHome page
E. S. Okello and S. Ekblad
Lay Concepts of Depression among the Baganda of Uganda: A Pilot Study.
Transcultural Psychiatry, June 1, 2006; 43(2): 287 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.