Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siddiqi, S
Right arrow Articles by Mumtaz, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siddiqi, S
Right arrow Articles by Mumtaz, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 16(2): 193-198
© Oxford University Press 2001

The effectiveness of patient referral in Pakistan

S Siddiqi, AA Kielmann, MS Khan, Nabeela Ali, A Ghaffar, Unaiza Sheikh and Zubya Mumtaz

Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan

In Pakistan, despite an elaborate network of over 5000 basic health units and rural health centres, supported by higher-level facilities, primary health care activities have not brought about expected improvements in health status, especially of rural population groups. A poorly functioning referral system may be partly to blame. System analysis of patient referral was conducted in a district of Punjab province (Attock) for the purpose of identifying major shortcomings, if any, in this domain.

Respondents from 225 households were interviewed. Of the households experiencing serious illnesses less than half were taken to a nearest first-level care facility (FLCF). Major reasons included dissatisfaction with quality of care offered, non-availability of physician, and patients being too ill to be taken to the FLCF. The FLCF utilization rate was less than 0.6 patient visits/person/year. The mean number of patients referred per FLCF during the previous 3 months was 6.5 ± 5.0. Only 15% of patients were referred on the prescribed referral form. None of the higher-level facilities provided feedback to FLCFs.

Records of higher-level facilities revealed lack of information on either patient referrals or feedback. There were no surgical or emergency obstetric services available at any of the first-level referral facilities. Seventy-five percent of the patients attending the first-level referral facilities and 44% of the patients attending higher-level facilities had a problem of a primary nature that could well have been managed at the FLCF.

As a result of the study findings, eight principal criteria were identified that need to be satisfied before a referral system may be considered functional.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.