Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kassouf, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mossialos, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kassouf, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mossialos, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 16(1): 21-28
© Oxford University Press 2001

Early entrance to the job market and its effect on adult health: evidence from Brazil

Ana Lúcia Kassouf1, Martin McKee2 and Elias Mossialos3

1 Economics Department, ESALQ, University of São Paulo, Brazil,
2 European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK and
3 LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK

Objective: To determine the effect of employment in childhood on self-reported health in adulthood.

Method: A cross-sectional household survey, with households selected through two-stage sampling, in urban and rural areas in the northeast and southeast of Brazil. A total of 4940 individuals, aged between 18 and 65 years, were included. The main outcome measure was self-reported health.

Results: There has been a marked reduction in the proportion of people starting work during childhood although, even in the youngest age group, nearly 20% of males began work when under 10. Early entrance into the labour market is strongly associated with low levels of both education and income, with income differentials remaining at later ages. Age starting work is also linked to current household income, with approximately 35% of those starting work when 15 or over currently in the top quartile of household income, compared with 12% of those starting work when under 10. Males, those living in rural areas, and non-whites are most likely to start work early. In univariate analyses, the younger a person started working, the greater the probability of reporting less than good health status as an adult. This persists through all ages, although the difference attenuates with increasing age. In multivariate analyses, adjustment for education or household income substantially reduces the effect but fails to eliminate it in several age bands up to the age of 48, indicating that age starting work has an independent effect on self-reported health in adulthood.

Conclusions: The debate about the appropriate policy response to child labour is complex, requiring a balance between protecting the health of the child and safeguarding the income of the family. These findings indicate the need for more research on the long-term sequelae of beginning work at an early age.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
S. A. E. Cortez, M. A. Barbieri, M. d. C. P. Saraiva, H. Bettiol, A. A. M. da Silva, and V. C. Cardoso
Does child labour affect final height?
Occup. Med., March 1, 2007; 57(2): 118 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M Frings-Dresen
Protecting waste collectors all around the world
Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2005; 62(12): 820 - 821.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. Smith and J. Lynch
Commentary: Social capital, social epidemiology and disease aetiology
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2004; 33(4): 691 - 700.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.