Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 15(4): 424-431
© Oxford University Press 2000


Other papers

Barriers to implementing South Africa’s Termination of Pregnancy Act in rural KwaZulu/Natal

Abigail Harrison1, Elizabeth T Montgomery1,2, Mark Lurie1,2 and David Wilkinson1

1 Centre for Epidemiological Research in South Africa (CERSA)/Hlabisa, Medical Research Council, Mtubatuba, South Africa and
2 Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

Introduction: South Africa’s Termination of Pregnancy Act, the most liberal abortion law in Africa, took effect early in 1997. In spite of the anticipated benefits to women’s health, however, public reaction has been mixed. In the country’s most populous province, KwaZulu/Natal, opposition is strong and most health care providers have refused to provide the service. This study explored attitudes and beliefs about abortion and the Termination of Pregnancy Act among primary care nurses and community members in a rural district in order to better understand barriers to implementation of the new law.

Methods: As part of a community survey on women’s reproductive health (n = 138), questions on knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about abortion were asked, as well as awareness of the provisions of the Termination of Pregnancy Act. To better understand the perspectives of health care workers, a survey among primary care nurses on duty (n = 25) was also conducted. In-depth interviews were conducted with both nurses and women in the community to further pursue issues raised in the two surveys.

Results: Support for the Act was low (11%) among both community members and nurses, and few supported abortion on request (18 and 6%, respectively). Within each group, however, a clear hierarchy of support was observed: a majority of nurses (56%) and community members (58%) supported abortion in the case of rape or incest, or if the continued pregnancy would endanger a woman’s health (61 and 56%, respectively), but few supported abortion for social or economic reasons. In-depth interviews revealed that abortion is seen as contrary to prevailing community norms; nurses were poorly informed about the Termination of Pregnancy Act and felt confused in their professional responsibilities.

Conclusions and recommendations: Legalization alone cannot ensure implementation of abortion services. In South Africa, extensive media coverage prior to passage of the law ensured almost universal awareness of the Act, but little public education took place at the same time. In spite of general opposition to the law, however, there is an encouraging level of support for abortion in some circumstances. These findings suggest that abortion services can be implemented, even in conservative rural areas, but that a process of information dissemination and community consent prior to implementation is essential. Locating abortion within broader reproductive health services could be an effective way to improve access and acceptability.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
L. Gilson and N. Raphaely
The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature 1994-2007
Health Policy Plan., September 1, 2008; 23(5): 294 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
E. Erasmus and L. Gilson
How to start thinking about investigating power in the organizational settings of policy implementation
Health Policy Plan., September 1, 2008; 23(5): 361 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
P. Maharaj and J. Cleland
Integration of sexual and reproductive health services in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Health Policy Plan., September 1, 2005; 20(5): 310 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P.A. le Roux, S.K. Tregoning, P.M. Zinn, and Z.M. van der Spuy
Inhibition of progesterone secretion with trilostane for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy: randomized controlled trials
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1483 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.