Health Policy and Planning; 15(4): 424-431
© Oxford University Press
2000
Other papers |
Barriers to implementing South Africas Termination of Pregnancy Act in rural KwaZulu/Natal
1 Centre for Epidemiological Research in South Africa (CERSA)/Hlabisa, Medical Research Council, Mtubatuba, South Africa and
2 Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Introduction: South Africas Termination of Pregnancy Act, the most liberal abortion law in Africa, took effect early in 1997. In spite of the anticipated benefits to womens health, however, public reaction has been mixed. In the countrys most populous province, KwaZulu/Natal, opposition is strong and most health care providers have refused to provide the service. This study explored attitudes and beliefs about abortion and the Termination of Pregnancy Act among primary care nurses and community members in a rural district in order to better understand barriers to implementation of the new law.
Methods: As part of a community survey on womens reproductive health (n = 138), questions on knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about abortion were asked, as well as awareness of the provisions of the Termination of Pregnancy Act. To better understand the perspectives of health care workers, a survey among primary care nurses on duty (n = 25) was also conducted. In-depth interviews were conducted with both nurses and women in the community to further pursue issues raised in the two surveys.
Results: Support for the Act was low (11%) among both community members and nurses, and few supported abortion on request (18 and 6%, respectively). Within each group, however, a clear hierarchy of support was observed: a majority of nurses (56%) and community members (58%) supported abortion in the case of rape or incest, or if the continued pregnancy would endanger a womans health (61 and 56%, respectively), but few supported abortion for social or economic reasons. In-depth interviews revealed that abortion is seen as contrary to prevailing community norms; nurses were poorly informed about the Termination of Pregnancy Act and felt confused in their professional responsibilities.
Conclusions and recommendations: Legalization alone cannot ensure implementation of abortion services. In South Africa, extensive media coverage prior to passage of the law ensured almost universal awareness of the Act, but little public education took place at the same time. In spite of general opposition to the law, however, there is an encouraging level of support for abortion in some circumstances. These findings suggest that abortion services can be implemented, even in conservative rural areas, but that a process of information dissemination and community consent prior to implementation is essential. Locating abortion within broader reproductive health services could be an effective way to improve access and acceptability.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Gilson and N. Raphaely The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature 1994-2007 Health Policy Plan., September 1, 2008; 23(5): 294 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Erasmus and L. Gilson How to start thinking about investigating power in the organizational settings of policy implementation Health Policy Plan., September 1, 2008; 23(5): 361 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Maharaj and J. Cleland Integration of sexual and reproductive health services in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa Health Policy Plan., September 1, 2005; 20(5): 310 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.A. le Roux, S.K. Tregoning, P.M. Zinn, and Z.M. van der Spuy Inhibition of progesterone secretion with trilostane for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy: randomized controlled trials Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1483 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

