Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumaranayake, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mpembeni, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kumaranayake, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mpembeni, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 15(4): 357-367
© Oxford University Press 2000


Part issue: Health Sector Regulation

How do countries regulate the health sector? Evidence from Tanzania and Zimbabwe

Lilani Kumaranayake1, Sally Lake1, Phare Mujinja2, Charles Hongoro3 and Rose Mpembeni2

1 Health Policy Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK,
2 Muhimbili University College of Health Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and
3 Blair Research Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe

The health sectors in many low- and middle-income countries have been characterized in recent years by extensive private sector activity. This has been complemented by increasing public–private linkages, such as the contracting-out of selected services or facilities, development of new purchasing arrangements, franchising and the introduction of vouchers. Increasingly, however, experience with the private sector has indicated a number of problems with the quality, price and distribution of private health services, and thus led to a growing focus on the role of government in regulation.

This paper presents the existing network of regulations governing private activity in the health sectors of Tanzania and Zimbabwe, and their appropriateness in the context of emerging market realities. It draws on a comparative mapping exercise reviewing the complexity of the variables currently being regulated, the level of the health system at which they apply, and the specific instruments being used. Findings indicate that much of the existing regulation occurs through legislation. There is still very much a focus on the ‘social’ rather than ‘economic’ aspects of regulation within the health sector. Recent changes have attempted to address aspects of private health provision, but some very key gaps remain. In particular, current regulations in Tanzania and Zimbabwe: (1) focus on individual inputs rather than health system organizations; (2) aim to control entry and quality rather than explicitly quantity, price or distribution; and (3) fail to address the market-level problems of anti-competitive practices and lack of patient rights.

This highlights the need for additional measures to promote consumer protection and address the development of new private markets such as for health insurance or laboratory and other ancillary services.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
C. Goodman, S P. Kachur, S. Abdulla, P. Bloland, and A. Mills
Drug shop regulation and malaria treatment in Tanzania why do shops break the rules, and does it matter?
Health Policy Plan., November 1, 2007; 22(6): 393 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. Nyazema, N. Viberg, S. Khoza, S. Vyas, L. Kumaranayake, G. Tomson, and C. S. Lundborg
Low sale of antibiotics without prescription: a cross-sectional study in Zimbabwean private pharmacies
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2007; 59(4): 718 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.