Health Policy and Planning; 15(3): 239-246
© Oxford University Press
2000
Review article |
Stakeholder analysis: a review
1 Senior Lecturer in Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK and
2 Health Policy Advisor, National Health Insurance Fund, Budapest, Hungary
The growing popularity of stakeholder analysis reflects an increasing recognition of how the characteristics of stakeholders individuals, groups and organizations influence decision-making processes. This paper reviews the origins and uses of stakeholder analysis, as described in the policy, health care management and development literature. Its roots are in the political and policy sciences, and in management theory where it has evolved into a systematic tool with clearly defined steps and applications for scanning the current and future organizational environment. Stakeholder analysis can be used to generate knowledge about the relevant actors so as to understand their behaviour, intentions, interrelations, agendas, interests, and the influence or resources they have brought or could bring to bear on decision-making processes. This information can then be used to develop strategies for managing these stakeholders, to facilitate the implementation of specific decisions or organizational objectives, or to understand the policy context and assess the feasibility of future policy directions. Policy development is a complex process which frequently takes place in an unstable and rapidly changing context, subject to unpredictable internal and external factors. As a cross-sectional view of an evolving picture, the utility of stakeholder analysis for predicting and managing the future is time-limited and it should be complemented by other policy analysis approaches.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. H. R. Mehrizi, F. Ghasemzadeh, and J. Molas-Gallart Stakeholder Mapping as an Assessment Framework for Policy Implementation Evaluation, October 1, 2009; 15(4): 427 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zerbo, K. M. Drabo, A. Berthe, J.-B. Ouedraogo, J. Macq, B. Dujardin, E. Mugisho, and P. Huygens Approche socio-anthropologique de la dynamisation du reseau d'acteurs de prise en charge des malades tuberculeux au Burkina Faso Global Health Promotion, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 72 - 80. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hoeijmakers, E. De Leeuw, P. Kenis, and N. K. De Vries Local health policy development processes in the Netherlands: an expanded toolbox for health promotion Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2007; 22(2): 112 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Baum, C. D. Resnik, J. J. Wu, and S. C. Roey Implementing Change in Health Professions Education: Stakeholder Analysis and Coalition Building J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(2): 79 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Weible An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2007; 17(1): 95 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I B Scheel, K B Hagen, and A D Oxman The unbearable lightness of healthcare policy making: a description of a process aimed at giving it some weight J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2003; 57(7): 483 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





