Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 15(2): 157-163
© Oxford University Press 2000

The Chinese experience of hospital price regulation

Xingzhu Liu1, Yuanli Liu2 and Ningshan Chen1

1 Institute of Social Medicine and Health Policy, Shandong Medical University, Jinan, China, and
2 Program in Health Care Financing at the Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, USA

This paper analyzes the distortion effects of the hospital pricing policies in China. To help maintain equitable access to hospital services, the Chinese government regulates prices of hospital services, and provides subsidies to public hospitals. Comparing the regulated fees of selected hospital services with their average unit costs indicates that the average cost-recovery rate of the fees is only 50%. The fees for 90% of the services are less than their average unit costs, while the fees for the high-tech services exceed their costs. Moreover, the State Price Commission allowed a drug profit margin of 15–20% over the wholesale price. The distorted fee schedule affects the behaviour of hospitals. Empirical evidence revealed problems of violation of price regulations (charging a fee exceeding the regulated fee), over-provision of profitable high-tech services and over-prescription of drugs. The Chinese experience shows that low regulated fees cannot reduce the economic burden on patients, and that distorted medical fees can result in distorted service provision and low efficiency of medical resources. Strategies to correct for the price distortions are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
L. Reynolds and M. McKee
Matching supply and demand for blood in Guizhou province, China: an unresolved challenge
J. Public Health Med., April 20, 2009; (2009) fdp030v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
Q. Sun, M. A. Santoro, Q. Meng, C. Liu, and K. Eggleston
Pharmaceutical Policy In China
Health Aff., July 1, 2008; 27(4): 1042 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health ManagementHome page
X. Hong
Why is the Rate of Cesarean Section in Urban China so High? Is the Price Transparency Policy Working?
Journal of Health Management, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 25 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health ManagementHome page
H. H. Dib, S. Y. Hong, Z. Bin, and S. Hongliang
Health Care Costs in China: Need for Intervention
Journal of Health Management, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 85 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Blumenthal and W. Hsiao
Privatization and Its Discontents -- The Evolving Chinese Health Care System
N. Engl. J. Med., September 15, 2005; 353(11): 1165 - 1170.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
A. Burke, Y.-Y. Wong, and Z. Clayson
Traditional Medicine in China Today: Implications for Indigenous Health Systems in a Modern World
Am J Public Health, July 1, 2003; 93(7): 1082 - 1084.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.