Health Policy and Planning, Vol 13, 446-458, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press
L Duran-Arenas, C Rivero, S Canton, R Rodriguez, F Franco, R Luna and J Catino
One of the primary obstacles in the implementation of continuous quality
improvement (CQI) programmes in developing countries is the lack of timely
and appropriate information for decentralized decision-making. The
integrated quality information systems (QIS) described herein demonstrates
Mexico's unique effort to package four separate, yet mutually reinforcing,
tools for the generation and use of quality-related information at all
levels of the Mexican national health care system. The QIS is one element
of the continuous quality improvement programme administered by the
Secretariate of Health in Mexico.Mexico's QIS was designed to be flexible
and capable of adapting to local needs, while at the same time allowing for
the standardization of health care quality assurance indicators, and
subsequent ability to measure and compare the quality performance of health
facilities nationwide. The flexibility of the system extends to permit the
optimal use of available data by health care managers at all levels of the
health care system, as well as the generation of new information in
important areas often neglected in more traditional information systems.
Mexico's QIS consists of four integrated components: 1) a set of client and
provider surveys, to assess specific issues in the quality of health
services delivered; 2) client and provider national satisfaction surveys;
3) a sentinel health events strategy; and 4) a national Comparative
Performance Evaluation System, for use by the Secretariate of Health for
the quality assessment of state and provincial health care services
(internal benchmarking).The QIS represents another step in Mexico's ongoing
effort to use data for effective decision-making in the planning,
monitoring and evaluation of services delivered by the national health care
system. The design and application of Mexico's QIS provides a model for
decentralized decision-making that could prove useful for developing
countries, where the effective use of quality indicators is often limited.
Further, the system could serve as a mechanism for motivating positive
change in the way information is collected and used in the process of
ensuring high quality health care service delivery.
ARTICLES
The development of a quality information system: a case study of Mexico
Health Systems Organization, Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Mexico; Health Economics Division, Center for Strategic Development of Social Security, Mexico; Secretariate of Health, Mexico; Quality and Technology Assessment Division, General Directorate of Health Economic Studies, Secretariate of Health, Mexico; Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Mexico General Hospital, Secretariate of Health, Mexico; Division of Statistics, Secretariate of Health, Mexico; National Institute of Public Health, Mexico
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?