Health Policy and Planning; 11(2): 156-168
© 1996
review-article |
Breastfeeding promotion and priority setting in health
1University of Toronto Institute for Policy Analysis Canada,
2International Science and Technology Institute Arlington, VA, USA
3Consultant UK
4International Science and Technology Institute, Sturgeon Bay Wl, USA
5Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut USA
6WELLSTART International Washington DC, USA
7Social Security Institute, Ministry of Health Honduras
8University of Campinas, Sao Paulo Brazil
Correspondence: Susan Horton, University of Toronto, Institute for Policy Analysis, 140 George Street, Suite 707, Toronto, M5S 1A1, Canada.
An increase in exclusive breastfeeding prevalence can substantially reduce mortality and morbidity among infants. In this paper, estimates of the costs and impacts of three breastfeeding promotion programmes, implemented through maternity services in Brazil, Honduras and Mexico, are used to develop cost-effectiveness measures and these are compared with other health interventions. The results show that breastfeeding promotion can be one of the most cost-effective health interventions for preventing cases of diarrhoea, preventing deaths from diarrhoea, and gaining disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The benefits are substantial over a broad range of programme types. Programmes starting with the removal of formula and medications during delivery are likely to derive a high level of impact per unit of net incremental cost. Cost-effectiveness is lower (but still attractive relative to other interventions) if hospitals already have rooming-in and no bottle-feeds; and the cost-effectiveness improves as programmes become well-established. At an annual cost of about 30 to 40 US cents per birth, programmes starting with formula feeding in nurseries and maternity wards can reduce diarrhoea cases for approximately $0.65 to $1.10 per case prevented, diarrhoea deaths for $100 to $200 per death averted, and reduce the burden of disease for approximately $2 to $4 per DALY. Maternity services that have already eliminated formula can, by investing from $2 to $3 per birth, prevent diarrhoea cases and deaths for $3.50 to $6.75 per case, and $550 to $800 per death respectively, with DALYs gained at $12 to $19 each.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Perez-Escamilla Evidence Based Breast-Feeding Promotion: The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative J. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 137(2): 484 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R Waters, M. E Penny, H. M Creed-Kanashiro, R. C Robert, R. Narro, J. Willis, L. E Caulfield, and R. E Black The cost-effectiveness of a child nutrition education programme in Peru Health Policy Plan., July 1, 2006; 21(4): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Paricio Talayero, M. Lizan-Garcia, A. O. Puime, M. J. B. Muncharaz, B. B. Soto, M. Sanchez-Palomares, L. S. Serrano, and L. L. Rivera Full Breastfeeding and Hospitalization as a Result of Infections in the First Year of Life Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): e92 - e99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Adam, S. S Lim, S. Mehta, Z. A Bhutta, H. Fogstad, M. Mathai, J. Zupan, and G. L Darmstadt Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries BMJ, November 12, 2005; 331(7525): 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Perez-Escamilla Breast feeding must consider HIV transmission in Latin America and the Caribbean BMJ, November 17, 2001; 323(7322): 1188 - 1188. [Full Text] |
||||



