Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DIOP, F.
Right arrow Articles by BITRAN, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DIOP, F.
Right arrow Articles by BITRAN, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy and Planning; 10(3): 223-240
© 1995


other

The impact of alternative cost recovery schemes on access and equity in Niger

FRANCOIS DIOP, ABDO YAZBECK and RICARDO BITRAN

Associates Inc

Francois Diop, Abt Associates Inc., 4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 600, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

The authors examine accessibility and the sustainability of quality health care in a rural setting under two alternative cost recovery methods, a fee-for-service method and a type of social financing (risk-sharing) strategy based on an annual tax + fee-for-service. Both methods were accompanied by similar interventions aimed at improving the quality of primary health services. Based on pilot tests of cost recovery in the non-hospital sector in Niger, the article presents results from baseline and final survey data, as well as from facility utilization, cost, and revenue data collected in two test districts and a control district. Cost recovery accompanied by quality improvements increases equity and access to health care and the type of cost recovery method used can make a difference. In Niger, higher access for women, children, and the poor resulted from the tax + fee method, than from the pure fee-for-service method. Moreover, revenue generation per capita under the tax + fee method was two times higher than under the fee-for-service method, suggesting that the prospects of sustainability were better under the social financing strategy. However, sustainability under cost recovery and improved quality depends as much on policy measures aimed at cost containment, particularly for drugs, as on specific cost recovery methods.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
K. D Rao, H. Waters, L. Steinhardt, S. Alam, P. Hansen, and A. J. Naeem
An experiment with community health funds in Afghanistan
Health Policy Plan., July 1, 2009; 24(4): 301 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
J. Polonsky, D. Balabanova, B. McPake, T. Poletti, S. Vyas, O. Ghazaryan, and M. K. Yanni
Equity in community health insurance schemes: evidence and lessons from Armenia
Health Policy Plan., May 1, 2009; 24(3): 209 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
W. C. Hsiao
Why Is A Systemic View Of Health Financing Necessary?
Health Aff., July 1, 2007; 26(4): 950 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
A. Wagstaff, F. Bustreo, J. Bryce, M. Claeson, and the Who-World Bank Child Health and Poverty Workin
Child Health: Reaching the Poor
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2004; 94(5): 726 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.